🔥18308

pixel_start

Lil Durk likes to use social media to relay messages like this.

image

“I can drop this single and f*ck up the streets on god your release date ain’t safe son son,” Durk typed.

However, he doesn’t like when the blogs take his bait and make it into their bait.

image

“If I don’t say it out loud it’s not real stop click baiting smurk back to album,” he typed.

Is Smurk correct to suggest that he is the sole owner of his own bait?

Or does an artist’s bait become free game for blogs and news sites to turn into their clickbait once the artist releases said bait into the wild?

pixel_end

Related Posts

UMG Is Behind Kendrick Lamar’s Grammy Wins, Says DJ Akademiks

Maxo Kream On Fight With Rizzoo Rizzoo: ‘It Wasn’t ‘Posed To Get On The Internet’

#DXCLUSIVE: Classified Recruits Dax & Snak The Ripper For ‘Rap Shit’ Single

Hear The Wu-Tang Clan Blaze Madlib Beats on a New Mash-Up Tape

21 Savage’s New Look Renders Him unrecognizable

Boosie Badazz Responds To Kodak Black’s ’11AM in Malibu’ Diss