🔥18208

pixel_start

Lil Durk likes to use social media to relay messages like this.

image

“I can drop this single and f*ck up the streets on god your release date ain’t safe son son,” Durk typed.

However, he doesn’t like when the blogs take his bait and make it into their bait.

image

“If I don’t say it out loud it’s not real stop click baiting smurk back to album,” he typed.

Is Smurk correct to suggest that he is the sole owner of his own bait?

Or does an artist’s bait become free game for blogs and news sites to turn into their clickbait once the artist releases said bait into the wild?

pixel_end

Related Posts

Freeway Rick Ross Explains Why Prison Could Be Particularly Rough For Tory Lanez

YEEZY and Balenciaga Team on DMX Tribute Shirt, Donating Net Proceeds to Simmons Family

Lil Durk Threatens A Feature Run

Dr. Dre Speaks On Snoop Dogg Owning Death Row

MixedByAli on Making “Human Music” with Kendrick Lamar, Baby Keem, & More

“It Should Just Flow”: An Interview With Stalley