🔥17791

pixel_start

Lil Durk likes to use social media to relay messages like this.

image

“I can drop this single and f*ck up the streets on god your release date ain’t safe son son,” Durk typed.

However, he doesn’t like when the blogs take his bait and make it into their bait.

image

“If I don’t say it out loud it’s not real stop click baiting smurk back to album,” he typed.

Is Smurk correct to suggest that he is the sole owner of his own bait?

Or does an artist’s bait become free game for blogs and news sites to turn into their clickbait once the artist releases said bait into the wild?

pixel_end

Related Posts

Looks Like Kanye’s Dentist Really Did Get Him Hooked On Nitrous and Took Advantage

‘Needle 2 The Groove’: Jill Scott Calls Childish Gambino’s ‘Because The Internet’ Vinyl A “Complete Vision”

The Mysterious End of ILLFIGHTYOU, and the Future of Tacoma Music

Westside Gunn Drops ‘Pray For Paris’ Album

Frank Ocean Cancels Upcoming Vinyl Release of “Little Demon”

Projections For Juice WRLD’s ‘The Party Never Ends 2.0’ & Kendrick Lamar’s ‘GNX’ Week 2