🔥18150

pixel_start

Lil Durk likes to use social media to relay messages like this.

image

“I can drop this single and f*ck up the streets on god your release date ain’t safe son son,” Durk typed.

However, he doesn’t like when the blogs take his bait and make it into their bait.

image

“If I don’t say it out loud it’s not real stop click baiting smurk back to album,” he typed.

Is Smurk correct to suggest that he is the sole owner of his own bait?

Or does an artist’s bait become free game for blogs and news sites to turn into their clickbait once the artist releases said bait into the wild?

pixel_end

Related Posts

One Of The Hot Boys Addressed Birdman Falling Asleep On Stage

Casanova Believes He Manifested His Prison Sentence With His Lyrics

Suge Knight Claims Deion Sanders didn’t Want To Deal With “Black Owned” Company

Skip Bayless Questions San Francisco 49ers For Partying With Lil Wayne After Losing Super Bowl LIV

Boosie Badazz Breaks His Silence Following Backlash Over Comments On Dwyane Wade’s Transgender Daughter

Report: Tory Lanez Now Wants To Be Moved To General Population