🔥18136

pixel_start

Lil Durk likes to use social media to relay messages like this.

image

“I can drop this single and f*ck up the streets on god your release date ain’t safe son son,” Durk typed.

However, he doesn’t like when the blogs take his bait and make it into their bait.

image

“If I don’t say it out loud it’s not real stop click baiting smurk back to album,” he typed.

Is Smurk correct to suggest that he is the sole owner of his own bait?

Or does an artist’s bait become free game for blogs and news sites to turn into their clickbait once the artist releases said bait into the wild?

pixel_end

Related Posts

Rick Ross’s Jesus Piece Is a Massive Tribute to the Son of God [PHOTOS]

Blueface Speaks On His Bisexual Hands

Lord Jamar Sides With Jay Electronica Against Peter Rosenberg

Watch 9th Wonder and Bob James Discuss The Evolution of Sampling

Eminem To Appear On Mike Tyson’s ‘Hotboxin’ Podcast … Tonight

JAY-Z is Suing Dame Dash for Attempting to Steal and Sell ‘Reasonable Doubt’ as an NFT