🔥17805

pixel_start

Lil Durk likes to use social media to relay messages like this.

image

“I can drop this single and f*ck up the streets on god your release date ain’t safe son son,” Durk typed.

However, he doesn’t like when the blogs take his bait and make it into their bait.

image

“If I don’t say it out loud it’s not real stop click baiting smurk back to album,” he typed.

Is Smurk correct to suggest that he is the sole owner of his own bait?

Or does an artist’s bait become free game for blogs and news sites to turn into their clickbait once the artist releases said bait into the wild?

pixel_end

Related Posts

Jay Electronica Says He’s Met the Illuminati & Dishes on What they Were like

Beenie Man & Bounty Killer To Battle For Verzuz Sound Clash Edition

Noise Pollution: Hotel on Mars Builds a Museum for Grief and Barra Brown Leads Portland’s Jazz Scene

Westside Gunn Co-Signs His ‘Pray For Paris’ Is Better Than DaBaby’s ‘Blame It On Baby’

Mndsgn Assembled His Dreamteam to Make a Symphonic and Sophisticated R&B Suite

Lil Nas X Responds To Pastor Troy’s Homophobic Rant