🔥18310

pixel_start

Lil Durk likes to use social media to relay messages like this.

image

“I can drop this single and f*ck up the streets on god your release date ain’t safe son son,” Durk typed.

However, he doesn’t like when the blogs take his bait and make it into their bait.

image

“If I don’t say it out loud it’s not real stop click baiting smurk back to album,” he typed.

Is Smurk correct to suggest that he is the sole owner of his own bait?

Or does an artist’s bait become free game for blogs and news sites to turn into their clickbait once the artist releases said bait into the wild?

pixel_end

Related Posts

Ousted Grammy CEO Claims To Have ‘Evidence’ Award Show Is ‘Ripe With Corruption’

Ice-T Reveals ‘Law & Order: SVU’ Has Been Renewed For 3 More Seasons

Looks Like Summer Walker Has a Famous New Man

We Will Soon Know Who Now Owns the One-of-a-Kind Wu-Tang Clan Album

What’s Killing The Video Star?

Drake’s Dad Stunts Another Ridiculous Fit