🔥18301

pixel_start

Lil Durk likes to use social media to relay messages like this.

image

“I can drop this single and f*ck up the streets on god your release date ain’t safe son son,” Durk typed.

However, he doesn’t like when the blogs take his bait and make it into their bait.

image

“If I don’t say it out loud it’s not real stop click baiting smurk back to album,” he typed.

Is Smurk correct to suggest that he is the sole owner of his own bait?

Or does an artist’s bait become free game for blogs and news sites to turn into their clickbait once the artist releases said bait into the wild?

pixel_end

Related Posts

Mustard Explains Why He Has No Interest In Ever Working With Drake

Cam’ron’s Flawless Double Dutching Wows The Internet — Espcially Phonte

Flesh-N-Bone Warns Nelly About Drug Use After Gangsta Boo’s Death

Carnegie Hall Will Be Hosting a Afrofuturism Festival Starring Flying Lotus, Sun Ra Arkestra, & More

Travis Scott & Kid Cudi Connect For ‘The Scotts’ Single

Kodak Black Looks Like He Might Suit Up For Florida Atlantic Football