🔥17799

pixel_start

Lil Durk likes to use social media to relay messages like this.

image

“I can drop this single and f*ck up the streets on god your release date ain’t safe son son,” Durk typed.

However, he doesn’t like when the blogs take his bait and make it into their bait.

image

“If I don’t say it out loud it’s not real stop click baiting smurk back to album,” he typed.

Is Smurk correct to suggest that he is the sole owner of his own bait?

Or does an artist’s bait become free game for blogs and news sites to turn into their clickbait once the artist releases said bait into the wild?

pixel_end

Related Posts

“There’s No Point in Having the Platform If You Have Nothing to Say:” An Interview with Sleaford Mods

Will Smith Fires Back At Beard Critics With Movie Montage Of His Classic Films

CNN’s Don Lemon Calls Out Drake, Diddy & More Celebrities To Do More For Protestors

Wake Self’s Posthumous "Ready To Live" Album Hits Streaming Services

Black Star Putting on Surprise New York City Concert Days After ‘SNL’ Appearance

Another One Of Diddy’s Accusers Willing To Work With The Feds