🔥18187

pixel_start

Lil Durk likes to use social media to relay messages like this.

image

“I can drop this single and f*ck up the streets on god your release date ain’t safe son son,” Durk typed.

However, he doesn’t like when the blogs take his bait and make it into their bait.

image

“If I don’t say it out loud it’s not real stop click baiting smurk back to album,” he typed.

Is Smurk correct to suggest that he is the sole owner of his own bait?

Or does an artist’s bait become free game for blogs and news sites to turn into their clickbait once the artist releases said bait into the wild?

pixel_end

Related Posts

Travis Scott Reportedly Cops $3M Bugatti For 28th Birthday

From Def Jam To Snoop Dogg, Bill Adler Talks 4 Decades Of Hip Hop History

Diddy Son Justin Combs Sued For Sexual Assault And Gang Rape

Yo Gotti On Diddy & Ma$e Dispute: ‘Business Is Business’

Royce Da 5’9 Unveils ‘The Allegory’ Album Details With ‘Overcomer’ Video

Kanye’s Ex Julia Fox Gives Tour Of Small NYC Apartment She Shares With Son & Mice