🔥18087

pixel_start

Lil Durk likes to use social media to relay messages like this.

image

“I can drop this single and f*ck up the streets on god your release date ain’t safe son son,” Durk typed.

However, he doesn’t like when the blogs take his bait and make it into their bait.

image

“If I don’t say it out loud it’s not real stop click baiting smurk back to album,” he typed.

Is Smurk correct to suggest that he is the sole owner of his own bait?

Or does an artist’s bait become free game for blogs and news sites to turn into their clickbait once the artist releases said bait into the wild?

pixel_end

Related Posts

Wack 100 Says The Game’s ‘Born 2 Rap’ Royalties Are His: ‘I Don’t Owe That Bitch A Dime’

Kendrick Lamar Performs ‘Not Like Us’ In Toronto, Fans Beg For More & Scream ‘A-Minor’

10 Akron, Ohio Rappers That Should Be on Your Radar

KAYTRANADA Wants to Start His Own TikTok Challenge with “Caution”

Kodak Black’s Artist Jackboy Delivers Self-Titled Project

Son Raw – Machinedrum: Ecstasy Boom