🔥18066

pixel_start

Bradford Cohen is most famous in these parts for being Kodak Black’s lawyer and father figure.

Cohen has done great things for Yak, whose rap sheet suggests he should be in prison for this and many more years.

Yesterday, Cohen used his skills to jump on IG and explain the difference between Gunna and Tekashi 6ix9ine when it comes to snitching.

“I have been getting an enormous amount of DMs asking my opinion on Gunna vs 69 comparison. It’s interesting, but in my opinion different scenarios. First I don’t judge what a Def does in their own interest. That’s their business. You can decide if you FW them or not and that’s your decision. Some people believe any snitching is snitching. In Gunna’s case his plea only effects the defense of Ythug if he was to blame Gunna for drugs in the car. Other than that the statement doesn’t come into a trial. Now vs. 69. That was full on testifying against co def and against others in the industry. Again, not saying what’s right or wrong, but there is a distinct difference in the 2 situations. What do you think…is any snitching snitching?

What do you think?

pixel_end

Related Posts

Soulja Boy Keeps Flexing His TikTok Earnings As Congressional Ban Heats Up

Diddy Accused Of Attempting Human Sacrifice

Lord Jamar Contemplates Brand Nubian Eminem Diss Track Produced By DJ Premier

Where There is No Time: Madlib’s Sound Ancestors

Tyler The Creator Officially Announces New Album ‘Call Me If You Get Lost’

Benny the Butcher and Hit-Boy Join Forces For the “Legend” Video